Transaction Systems Architects, Inc. - Company Profile, Information, Business Description, History, Background Information on Transaction Systems Architects, Inc.

224 South 108th Avenue
Omaha
Nebraska
68154-2684
U.S.A.

Company Perspectives

TSA's solutions are positioned at the heart of the growing electronic payments market. TSA's solutions are highly differentiated in large-scale, complex technology environments, and have been proven in most demanding environments. TSA licenses its solutions based on product features, transaction volume and term, and also sells complimentary services and product maintenance. As TSA's customers' systems grow, TSA benefits. With its leading market position and business model, TSA is uniquely positioned to benefit from the generational shift away from paper to electronic payments. TSA's customers process over 65 billion electronic payment transactions per year and growing. TSA's investment in technology, customer support and expertise help drive its strong customer retention, and ensure that TSA will be a long-term beneficiary of the shift from paper to pulse.

History of Transaction Systems Architects, Inc.

Transaction Systems Architects, Inc., (TSA) develops software for processing electronic payments. The company's customers include large banks and retailers. TSA's electronic funds transfer (EFT) software is used in transactions involving automated teller machines, point-of-sale terminals, wire transfers, home banking, and credit and debit cards. Originally developed around proprietary computers systems made by Tandem (later absorbed by Compaq and Hewlett-Packard), TSA has since embraced open standards. Diversification was achieved through acquisitions, giving the company greater market reach and positioning it in burgeoning markets, such as e-commerce. Annual revenues swelled during the expansion, rising from approximately $70 million in 1992 to nearly $300 million six years later. A falloff in Y2K-related business ensued, however, followed by a period of slow growth. Nevertheless, TSA has remained well positioned in the center of the global trend toward more electronic processing of payments. Two-thirds of the company's revenues are derived from outside the United States.

Origins

TSA's corporate roots stretch to the origins of one of its subsidiaries, Nebraska-born Applied Communications Inc. Applied Communications was founded in 1975 by computer programmer James Cody and two colleagues. The entrepreneurs had developed electronic funds transfer software for banks, marking their entry into a nascent yet soon-to-burgeon industry. Point-of-sale (POS) systems that enabled card-based, electronic payments were introduced in the early 1980s to accommodate consumer preferences for using credit and debit cards instead of cash or checks. Prior to the development of automated POS systems, card-based transactions generally were processed manually, using paper-based systems to obtain authorization from card-issuing banks. As the volume of credit and debit card transactions increased, however, a more sophisticated method of authorization was needed. Card-issuing banks, with the backing of VISA and MasterCard, offered financial incentives to promote the development and use of POS-related technologies, which spawned the creation of electronic payment systems that improved accuracy, reduced costs, increased efficiency, and reduced credit card abuse and fraud. Cody and his partners were early developers in this field, entering when the technology was raw and the use of such technology was a relatively novel alternative, rather than obligatory, as electronic-based systems later would be. Although Applied Communications was marketing a product whose time was yet to come, the company did well early on, with its software making enough of an impression on bankers to overcome the less than reassuring appearance of Cody, who on one sales visit sold the company's software while wearing mismatched shoes.

By the time electronic-based systems had started to become commonplace, Applied Communications was prepared to take advantage of a market that had caught up to its pioneering technology. The company went public in 1983 to gain the financial resources to expand and began doing so aggressively, particularly overseas. Until 1982, Applied Communications had never made an effort to cultivate international business and, consequently, collected only a fraction of its revenues from foreign sales. Although the company had not made itself known to the global marketplace, overseas businesses had heard of Applied Communications. The company's marketing staff began receiving a growing number of unsolicited inquiries about its software in 1982, prompting an organized pursuit of overseas business and the establishment of an international distribution unit, ACI Ltd. (ACIL). Much of Applied Communications' growth during the decade was derived from the concerted, international effort to market its software for automated teller machines (ATMs) and POS systems, contributing to a more than sixfold increase in the company's workforce between 1982 and 1989. Applied Communications was awarded the President's "E" Award for excellence in exporting in 1987 and by 1989 was selling its software in 29 countries. By the end of the decade, international sales accounted for more than half of the company's revenue.

Ownership Changes

Midway through the company's decade-long expansion overseas, Applied Communications became the target of a much larger suitor. The demand for its technology had increased exponentially since the company's founding, repositioning the software developer from the fringe of the mainstream market to the center of attention. U S West was interested in Applied Communications' expertise, and it purchased the company in 1986. Life as a subsidiary of a much larger parent gave the company voluminous financial support, but freedom was the expense. U S West, not surprisingly, was pursuing its own objectives and enlisted the assistance of Applied Communications to achieve those objectives, directing the company to develop telephone company systems.

The redirection of Applied Communications' focus ran counter to the company's original focus, an alteration that a third company, Tandem Computers Inc., found disturbing. The reason for Tandem's anxiety, and the company's eventual intervention into the relationship between U S West and Applied Communications, hinged on one of the fundamental aspects of Applied Communications' success. Early in its corporate life, Applied Communications had allied itself to Tandem's technology, programming its software to run on the computer manufacturer's hardware, which was used by an overwhelming majority of banks. Under U S West's ownership, however, Applied Communications' focus had shifted, provoking Tandem to respond. "We didn't see [Applied Communications] flourishing under U S West ownership," explained a Tandem official, "so we decided to acquire them to protect our joint customer base." The acquisition, completed in 1991, gave Tandem control of Applied Communications and ACIL for slightly less than $60 million.

The change in ownership returned Applied Communications' focus to the banking industry. Virtually all of the company's software was designed to run exclusively on the computers made by its new parent company, but despite the strong synergy between the two companies, Tandem professed no desire to own Applied Communications on a long-term basis. By 1993, after two-and-a-half years of control, Tandem decided to sell Applied Communications, explaining that its subsidiary was sufficiently profitable to operate on its own. Under the terms of the agreement, Tandem sold Applied Communications and ACIL, which had moved to London in 1992, to a management-led group for $80 million.

Expansion Following Independence in 1993

Leading the group of senior executives who purchased Applied Communications was William E. Fisher, the individual who guided the company during its newfound independence. Fisher, who received his MBA from the University of Nebraska, had joined Applied Communications in 1987 and held a number of different titles, including president of financial systems, senior vice-president of software and services, executive vice-president, and chief operating officer. When Tandem bought the company from U S West in 1991, Fisher was named chairman and chief executive officer, the same offices to which he was appointed when a new company was formed to facilitate the management-led buyout from Tandem. Transaction Systems Architects, Inc., (TSA) was formed as ACI Holding, Inc., in November 1993 and the acquisition of Applied Communications and ACIL occurred the following month, completed on the last day of 1993.

During its last full year as a Tandem subsidiary, Applied Communications had generated more than $70 million in revenue, ranking it as the world's largest supplier of electronic funds transfer software programmed for Tandem computers. In the years ahead, however, the company's business would be far less dependent on the success of Tandem ATM and POS hardware. "As we look forward," Fisher said, "we know our future is open systems." Independence provided Fisher with the opportunity to develop software for other platforms, such as Microsoft Corp.'s NT operating system, as well as Unix and IBM operating systems. Although the company continued to regard its software partnership with Tandem as its mainstay business and continued to develop software for its longtime associate, the ability to diversify its product line to run on other vendors' computers opened numerous avenues for growth. It was Fisher's task to take advantage of these opportunities during the fast-paced growth of the middle and late 1990s.

After seven years of operating under the corporate umbrella of a parent company, TSA did not wait long to express its independence. Four days after the buyout from Tandem was completed, Fisher acquired U.S. Software Inc. (USSI), headquartered near Omaha, Nebraska, in Crater Lake, Iowa. Founded three years before TSA acquired it, USSI provided software solutions to the financial and payment card industries, developing its software products at a facility in Victoria, Texas. TSA's purchase of USSI signaled the beginning of an acquisition campaign that diversified TSA's product line and expertise beyond the capabilities of its core subsidiary, Applied Communications. The middle and late 1990s witnessed the rapid growth of electronic commerce around the globe, as card-based transactions proliferated and new areas of opportunities, such as home banking, emerged. To keep pace with technological advances surrounding it, TSA sought to accelerate its own technological development through the fastest means possible: by acquiring companies with expertise in emerging areas of growth. The company's motto was "it's an electronic world, we move the money," underscoring its intention to involve itself in as many as possible of the billions of card-based transactions that were completed annually.

Before TSA began to strategically position itself through acquisitions, the company filed for an initial public offering (IPO) in January 1995. The IPO of 2.75 million shares at $15 per share was completed the following month, giving the company the means to reduce its debt. Six months later, in August, TSA returned to Wall Street for additional cash from investors, completing a second sale of stock that netted the company $22 million. Fisher explained: "We had a strong IPO, and our underwriters thought we could have sold more shares. We decided to go back to the market in order to strengthen up our balance sheet a bit, as well as have some cash for acquisitions."

Financially invigorated after two stock offerings, the company turned its attention to the expanding markets and emerging industries in the "electronic world." Fisher was looking for acquisition candidates that could extend TSA's market reach and found one in late 1995. In October 1995 TSA acquired a German software firm named M.R. GmbH. Three more acquisitions--TXN Solution Integrators, Grapevine Systems, Inc., and Open Systems Solutions, Inc.--followed in 1996. By this point, more than 60 percent of the largest U.S. banks and nearly 25 percent of the 500 largest banks worldwide used software designed by TSA.

Revenues had more than doubled from the total generated under the auspices of Tandem, yet the majority of the company's business was derived from its BASE24 product line, programmed for Tandem computers. (In 1997 Tandem was acquired by Compaq Computer Corporation, which was itself acquired by Hewlett-Packard Co. five years later.) Applied Communications, responsible for the BASE24 software, still represented TSA's mainstay business, but the acquisitions were giving the company expertise in complementary and promising areas. One of these new market niches centered on "smart" cards, or plastic cards programmed with a particular monetary value that could be used at ATMs and elsewhere like a debit card. TSA established a name for itself in the smart card market with two acquisitions, the August 1998 purchase of Smart Card Integrators Ltd., a London-based technology developer for systems such as Modex and Visa Cash, and the November 1998 acquisition of Media Integration B.V., a Dutch smart card systems developer. Also in 1998, the company strengthened its presence in the market for home banking software, convinced that the practice of paying bills and transferring money from a consumer's home computer would develop into a widespread trend.

By the end of the 1990s, TSA stood as a strategically diversified, global company, marketing its products in 68 countries. For the immediate future, revenues were projected to increase 25 percent annually and earnings were expected to increase 35 percent. Based on this forecast, there was justifiable optimism for the company's success during the early 21st century, optimism expressed not only by TSA executives but also by stock analysts. "These guys don't get a lot of press," remarked one analyst in reference to TSA, "but they are a really well-positioned company." Despite rising revenues and earnings, however, the company's stock was not performing as well as some analysts believed it should, prompting several industry pundits to characterize TSA as a "sleeper" yet to be discovered by the investing public. "The company hasn't been given credit for the type of business it runs," explained an analyst at Lehman Brothers. Considering that the company was a direct beneficiary of lucrative trends in electronic commerce, the secrecy of its success appeared to be nearing its end.

Reorganizing After Y2K

Y2K conversions had been a major source of business as the company approached the year 2000. Unfortunately, there was a sudden falloff in sales after these preparations were completed. Revenues (as later restated) were about $300 million in 2000 and 2001, when the company posted a rare loss of $80 million.

TSA turned its attention to growing its e-commerce business, led by the InSession unit, although the volume of transactions completed through the Internet was still relatively low. MessagingDirect Ltd., a Canadian provider of software for presenting bills and financial statements, was acquired in October 2000 in an all-stock deal worth about $50 million.

Early in 2000, TSA was reorganized into six new business units: Consumer Banking; Corporate Banking e-Payments; Internet Infrastructure; Internet Banking; Electronic Commerce; and the new Health Claims Transaction Processing and Management unit. The aim was to make it easier to appropriate resources to lines with different needs; however, the grouping only lasted a few years. Consumer Banking remained by far the largest unit, accounting for 70 percent of revenues.

TSA continued to win important new banking clients, such as BB&T Co., which in 2003 chose TSA's new BASE24-es system, an open source product, for its nearly 2,000 ATMs in the Southeast. The company's existence was becoming complicated on the regulatory front, however. It restated three years of revenues during an SEC inquiry; faulty guidance from its former auditor, the defunct Arthur Anderson & Co., was blamed. The company's new chairman, Gregory Duman, resigned; he had been CFO at the time of the errors, which reportedly involved a few transactions with an electronic payments company in Utah.

Former Chairman and CEO Fisher had left the company in May 2001 after returning from retirement the previous year. Greg Derkacht became the company's next permanent chief executive in January 2002.

Revenues slipped slightly to $292 million in fiscal 2004. Although net income tripled to $46.7 million, Jana Partners L.L.C. was openly calling for a sale of the company. Jana was a hedge fund in San Francisco that held nearly 5 percent of TSA's shares and was notorious for strong-arming companies. Management refused to sell the company. Philip G. Heasley, formerly an executive with U.S. Bancorp and Bank One Corp., was hired as TSA's CEO in 2005 to help guide it through this situation.

S2 Systems Inc., a Plano, Texas-based company, was acquired for $35 million in the summer of 2005. Although only one-tenth the size of TSA, S2 brought with it a couple of large banks as well as a significant number of retail customers.

The company was reorganized along line and staff functions into a single operating unit in October 2005. IntraNet Worldwide and InSession Technologies were absorbed into the ACI Worldwide business unit, which had accounted for more than three-quarters of revenues in the previous 12 months.

The company was looking to grow internationally, in Latin America and especially Asia, Heasley told American Banker. It announced that it was buying Frankfurt, Germany's Electronic Payment Systems AG in May 2006 in a deal worth $36 million. The new acquisition led the market in a country that was said to have the third largest volume of electronic transactions in the world, behind the United States and the United Kingdom. It also had a fragmented banking industry ripe for third-party software sales, an analyst told American Banker. By this time, international sales accounted for two-thirds of TSA's revenues, which were $313 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 and were expected to rise to between $348 million and $360 million in fiscal 2006.

Principal Subsidiaries

ACI Worldwide Inc.; InSession, Inc.; ACI Worldwide (Japan) K.K.; Applied Communications Inc. U.K. Holding Limited; IntraNet Worldwide, Inc.; MessagingDirect Company (Canada).

Principal Divisions

Product; Americas; Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA); Asia/Pacific (A/P); Software as a Service.

Principal Operating Units

ACI Worldwide.

Principal Competitors

eFunds Corporation; Fair Isaac Corporation; S1 Corporation.

Chronology

  • Key Dates
  • 1975 Applied Communications is formed to market electronic funds transfer (EFT) software.
  • 1982 International distribution unit ACI Ltd. is formed.
  • 1983 Applied Communications goes public.
  • 1986 Phone giant U S West acquires Applied Communications.
  • 1989 International sales account for more than half of revenue.
  • 1991 Tandem Computers Inc. buys Applied Communications for about $60 million.
  • 1993 Transaction Systems Architects, Inc., is formed to facilitate a management buyout of Applied Communications; U.S. Software is acquired.
  • 1995 Transaction Systems Architects (TSA) goes public; the company begins an acquisition spree.
  • 1998 TSA invests in smart cards and home banking.
  • 2000 Business falls off suddenly as Y2K preparations end.
  • 2005 S2 Systems is acquired; TSA is reorganized around the ACI Worldwide business unit.
  • 2006 Electronic Payment Systems AG is acquired.

Additional Details

  • Public Company
  • Incorporated: 1975 as Applied Communications Inc.
  • Employees: 1,674
  • Sales: $313.24 million (2005)
  • Stock Exchanges: NASDAQ
  • Ticker Symbol: TSAI
  • NAIC: 511210 Software Publishers; 541511 Custom Computer Programming Services; 334113 Computer Terminal Manufacturing; 334111 Electronic Computer Manufacturing; 334119 Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing

Further Reference

  • Bills, Steve, "Heasley Gets His Chance in Hot Seat," American Banker, March 14, 2005, p. 1.
  • "Developer of ATM Technology Grows with New Products, Acquisitions," Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, February 24, 1998.
  • "Exporting Pays Off," Business America, July 3, 1989, p. 14.
  • Iida, Jeanne, "Tandem to Sell Software Unit to Its Senior Management," American Banker, November 16, 1993, p. 17.
  • Jennings, Robert, "Transaction Systems Architects Files for 2.75M-Share IPO to Retire Debt," American Banker, January 18, 1995, p. 19.
  • Jordon, Steve, "Founder Is Leaving As CEO of Omaha, Neb., Software Provider," Omaha World-Herald, May 3, 2001.
  • ------, "Investors Punish Omaha, Neb., Software Firm After Accounting Disclosure," Omaha World-Herald, August 16, 2002.
  • ------, "Omaha, Neb.-Based Software Firm Reports Questionable Accounting; Chief Resigns," Omaha World-Herald, August 15, 2002.
  • Larson, Virgil, "Acquisition to Boost TSA's 2006 Profits," Omaha World-Herald, July 1, 2005.
  • "Major Payment Systems Manufacturer Is in Play," Electronic Payments Week, March 1, 2005.
  • Marjanovic, Steven, "Payment Processor Drafts Former CEO to Stop Skid," American Banker, May 31, 2000, p. 14.
  • ------, "A Software Sleeper May Awaken in '99," American Banker, December 7, 1998, p. 32.
  • McLean, Bethany, "Cashing In on Plastic," Fortune, November 25, 1996, p. 218.
  • Norris, Melinda, "Omaha, Neb., ATM Technology Firm to Buy Milwaukee ATM Services Company," Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, December 3, 1998.
  • Shim, Grace, "Omaha, Neb.-Based Financial Transaction Software Firm to Buy Canadian Firm," Omaha World-Herald, October 27, 2000.
  • "Tandem to Buy Rest of ACI," Supermarket News, December 6, 1993, p. 21.
  • Tracey, Brian, "Transaction Systems of Omaha, Neb., Acquires Two Companies," Knight-Ridder/Tribune Business News, September 3, 1998.
  • ------, "Transaction Systems Raises $60M with Second Public Offering of Year," American Banker, August 14, 1995, p. 16.
  • "Transaction Systems Buying Intranet Inc.," American Banker, April 29, 1998, p. 15.
  • "Transaction Systems Closes on Dutch Deal," American Banker, December 4, 1998, p. 23.
  • "TSA Forms New Business Units," EFT Report, March 22, 2000.
  • "TSA Is Having Success with Software, Hopes for Same in SEC Investigation," ATM & Debit News, August 21, 2003, p. 1.
  • Wade, Will, "Software Vendor Has Deal to Enter Germany," American Banker, May 15, 2006, p. 17.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic:


Transaction Systems Architects, Inc. forum